Airport security
A single drone sighting can close a national airport; a single network intrusion can ground its operations. Counter-UAS layers, passive radar surveillance and cyber defence keep runways open and passengers moving.
An operation halted by a single intrusion
An airport runs on a fragile assumption: that its airspace and its systems are clear. A single unauthorised drone near a runway forces a precautionary shutdown, stranding passengers and cascading delays across a network for hours; a single intrusion into the systems that manage flights, baggage or air traffic can ground the operation just as effectively. For a nation, a major airport is both critical infrastructure and a shop window: an outage is highly visible, economically damaging and internationally embarrassing, which is exactly what makes it an attractive target.
The security team's problem is the mismatch between a low-effort threat and a high-consequence outcome. Detecting a small drone against the clutter of a busy airfield is genuinely hard, and the cost of a false alarm, halting operations unnecessarily, is itself severe, so detection must be reliable, not just present. Meanwhile the digital systems behind the airport were built for efficiency and are exposed to a threat that treats them as a way to stop a country's aviation from the keyboard.
Reliable air detection and defended systems
Counter-UAS & loitering munitions provide the core airspace layer, pairing detection radar tuned to the small, slow targets that hide in airfield clutter with the means to track and, where authorised, defeat a hostile drone, giving the airport confident detection rather than the uncertain sightings that force blanket shutdowns. Passive Radar adds surveillance that emits nothing, extending early warning across the approaches without adding to the electromagnetic congestion around an airport.
The digital side is held by Defensive cybersecurity, with continuous monitoring and incident response protecting the flight-management, air-traffic and baggage systems that an intrusion would target to ground the operation. Because all three come from independent, non-aligned makers, the airport's protection, and the knowledge of its vulnerabilities, stays with the national operator, without a foreign disclosure obligation over the security of a country's aviation gateway.
From runway protection to sustained aviation resilience
The first phase secures the airspace and the core systems at the principal airport, establishing reliable drone detection over the runway approaches and continuous defence of the systems whose failure would ground operations. That directly addresses the two events most likely to close the airport.
Coverage then extends, with additional passive sensing for earlier warning and the same protection replicated across secondary airports so the national aviation network is defended as a whole. The final phase is sovereign operation, with in-region crews running and sustaining both the air and cyber layers and training kept local. The outcome is aviation resilience the nation owns, keeping runways open and passengers moving under pressure.
How the airport is kept open, phase by phase
The operational approach treats the airport as one protected system rather than a set of separate fences. Passive Radar establishes low-observable coverage of the approaches and airspace without emitting anything an intruder can locate, Counter-UAS provides the layer that detects and defeats a drone before it can force a runway closure, and defensive cybersecurity protects the operational networks that keep aircraft moving. The outcome sought is continuity: runways that stay open and passengers who keep moving even under pressure.
The programme is phased so that investment follows evidence. A baseline of normal air and network activity is established first, so the systems can distinguish a routine movement from the anomaly that precedes an incursion. Persistent coverage and response are then tied into a single operations picture, so a detection at the perimeter or in the network becomes a coordinated action rather than an isolated alert.
The mission ends in sovereign operation: airport and security staff trained to run the counter-drone screen, the surveillance layer and the cyber defence themselves, with localisation arrangements scoped per programme, subject to export controls and end-use approvals. Delivered through a single accountable channel drawing on independent, non-aligned makers, the capability protects a critical national gateway without depending on an outside operator to keep it running.
Relevant capability
Relevant solutions
Layered defence against hostile unmanned aircraft: detection, tracking and defeat priced for the mass threat rather than a missile economy that empties the magazine first.
Solution page →Power, water, transport and port systems assessed, hardened and watched continuously, by a team with no foreign government to report the findings to.
Solution page →Who faces this problem
Frequently asked questions
Why is detecting a drone at an airport so difficult?
A small, slow drone hides in the clutter of a busy airfield, and a false alarm that halts operations is itself costly, so detection must be reliable, not merely present. Counter-UAS & loitering munitions use radar tuned to exactly these targets, giving confident detection rather than the uncertain sightings that force blanket precautionary shutdowns.
How can a cyber intrusion ground an airport?
The flight-management, air-traffic and baggage systems that keep an airport running are digital and exposed. An intrusion into them can halt operations as effectively as a physical threat. Defensive cybersecurity monitors and defends those systems continuously, containing an attack before it grounds the operation.
Does an airport's protection depend on a foreign supplier?
No. The counter-drone systems, passive radar and cyber defence all come from independent, non-aligned makers, so protection and the knowledge of the airport's vulnerabilities stay with the national operator, without a foreign disclosure obligation over the security of a country's aviation gateway.
Related problems
Cheap unmanned aircraft now threaten airports, energy sites, borders and public events in every region. Layered counter-UAS, combining detection radar tuned to small slow targets, passive sensing and defeat systems, is the affordable answer recent conflicts demand.
Problem pagePower grids, water systems and transport networks face both physical and cyber attack. Hardening the control systems behind them, defending the networks around them and countering the drone threat above them keeps essential services running under pressure.
Problem pageMinistries, registries and national databases are under continuous attack from criminal and state-linked actors. Around-the-clock defensive operations, authorised red-teaming and architectures for disconnected environments protect the systems a state runs on, accountable to your government, not a foreign one.
Problem page


