Question 1

Which Unstrat capabilities address "Coastal radar stops at the horizon. Your economic zone does not."?

Accepted Answer

Unstrat brings together Ocean surveillance satellites, Fish Detection and Maritime Cybersecurity. The Satellite Programme Partner's ocean surveillance satellites detect and track vessels across the EEZ and the open ocean, under a sovereign contract that keeps tasking, downlink and processing inside the nation's jurisdiction, and fuse AIS, radar, optical and RF into one operating picture. The Ocean Data Specialist turns that sensing into fishing-zone advisories and leads on unregulated fishing, drawing on data-science work supported by the UN World Food Programme, the European Space Agency and the World Bank. The Cybersecurity Group's maritime cybersecurity, proven on more than 1,500 vessels at sea, hardens the ships and ports that hold the picture together. One accountable, non-aligned channel represents the set. The practical result is a dark vessel that gets found, an enforcement action that can be justified afterwards, and a picture that does not go quiet because a foreign partner reprioritised.

Question 2

What problem does this solution solve?

Accepted Answer

Coastal radar reaches only so far, and the maritime threat runs from the open ocean to the quayside. Illegal fishing strips grounds a fleet depends on, smuggling moves through the water between patrols, and grey-zone activity happens well beyond any shore sensor's horizon. The vessels doing it turn off their transponders on purpose. Building real awareness means fusing wide-area and in-port sensing into one picture the nation controls, and being able to act on it without waiting for permission. A single picture of a nation's waters, orbit to harbour, for EEZ enforcement, illegal-fishing detection and port security, held on national tasking rather than a coalition's.

Question 3

Can "Coastal radar stops at the horizon. Your economic zone does not." be procured as one programme rather than several suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Rather than integrating several foreign primes yourself, you acquire Ocean surveillance satellites, Fish Detection and Maritime Cybersecurity through one accountable channel, a single team responsible from first briefing through delivery and in-region sustainment. Each capability is sourced from an independent, non-aligned manufacturer, so the programme carries no major-power disclosure rules or political ramifications.

Question 4

What is maritime domain awareness?

Accepted Answer

Maritime domain awareness is the effective understanding of everything in a nation's waters that could affect its security, economy or environment, assembled into one picture from orbit to harbour. Coastal radar reaches only so far, but the threat runs from the open ocean to the port. Building the picture means fusing wide-area and in-port sensing into something the nation controls.

Question 5

How do you watch an EEZ beyond coastal radar range?

Accepted Answer

Wide-area sensing from orbit detects and tracks vessels across the exclusive economic zone and the open ocean beyond the reach of coastal radar and patrol assets. Those detections then cue the hulls and aircraft you have, turning a scarce patrol force into a response force. The picture is tasked on your waters and accountable to your flag rather than borrowed from a coalition feed.

Question 6

What layers make up a national maritime picture?

Accepted Answer

Three, in this solution: wide-area ocean surveillance from orbit that detects and tracks vessels, satellite-data fisheries analytics that turn sensing into fishing-zone advisories and illegal-fishing leads, and maritime cyber protection that hardens the ships and ports holding the picture together. Raw vessel feeds alone miss the fisheries intelligence and the port estate, which is why the three run as one architecture.

Question 7

Maritime awareness tasked on our waters rather than a coalition's priorities

Accepted Answer

A nation on shared coalition feeds sees its own EEZ through someone else's priorities, which is the dependency this solution is written against. Ocean surveillance here is tasked on your waters and accountable to your flag, with a growth path from data services toward sovereign sensing. The waters a state cannot see, it does not control.

Question 8

Detecting illegal fishing across national waters from satellite data

Accepted Answer

Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing drains coastal economies across Africa and the Indian Ocean, and it happens beyond patrol range. Satellite-data fisheries analytics read activity across the grounds that no single vessel can survey from the water, flagging unregulated fishing and cueing enforcement. The same chain also serves resource management, which makes the capability easier to fund and sustain.

Question 9

One maritime picture shared across navy, coast guard and fisheries

Accepted Answer

The purpose of a single architecture is to stop three agencies holding three versions of the truth. Detections from orbit cue patrol assets, fisheries analytics flag unregulated activity, and hardened port systems keep the infrastructure that receives the picture trustworthy. We build it as one architecture with a growth path, scoped to the waters, ports and threats that matter to you.

Question 10

Port and shipping cyber protection as part of maritime awareness

Accepted Answer

The picture is only as trustworthy as the ports and ships that receive it, and a port can be closed by code as effectively as by blockade. Maritime cyber protection hardens vessels, terminals and the supply chain, treating ships as floating industrial systems. It is part of the same maritime architecture rather than a separate IT procurement bolted on later.

Question 11

Satellite or coastal sensing for maritime surveillance, which does a coastal state need?

Accepted Answer

Coastal radar reaches only so far, and the maritime threat runs from the open ocean to the port, so the honest answer is that a serious picture needs both wide-area and in-port sensing fused. This solution leans on orbital sensing for the EEZ because that is where patrol range runs out, then adds fisheries analytics and port protection. The comparison page sets out the trade neutrally.

Question 12

Coastal radar stops at the horizon but our economic zone does not. How do we govern the whole EEZ?

Accepted Answer

You build the picture in layers and fuse them: wide-area ocean surveillance from orbit detects and tracks vessels across the EEZ, fisheries analytics turn that into advisories and illegal-fishing leads, and hardened ports keep the receiving infrastructure sound. Detections cue your patrol assets, so scarce hulls become a response force. It is one accountable, non-aligned channel across the three layers.

Question 13

Smuggling and grey-zone activity happen beyond our patrol range. How do we see it without a bigger fleet?

Accepted Answer

Wide-area sensing from orbit is precisely the affordable alternative to a bigger fleet, because it detects and tracks vessels far past coastal radar and cues the hulls you already have. Grey-zone activity exploits unwatched waters, so closing the gap is a sensing problem before it is a platform problem. The picture is tasked on your waters, and it grows from a data service toward sovereign sensing as budget allows.

Question 14

How does a coastal state grow maritime awareness from a data service toward sovereign sensing?

Accepted Answer

Maritime domain awareness is procured as an architecture with a growth path, from data services toward sovereign sensing, scoped to the waters and threats that matter. Each stage is structured so you move toward ownership rather than deeper subscription. We represent the orbital, fisheries-analytics and cyber layers through one accountable channel, with training that builds the national watch floor.

Question 15

Can one maritime picture serve resource management and enforcement, or do we need two procurements?

Accepted Answer

One, by design. The satellite-data chain serves both missions: fisheries agencies use it to guide fleets and assess stocks, while enforcement uses the same picture to monitor unregulated fishing. That dual civil-security use makes the capability easier to justify, fund and sustain, and it is why the solution runs the two off one architecture rather than two systems.

Question 16

What detection figures does the maritime solution publish, and what should we ask for in writing?

Accepted Answer

At the solution level we do not publish detection-range or accuracy figures, because they depend on the sensing mix and the waters you specify. Rather than quote a number without a defined scope, we scope the EEZ, ports and threats first and answer against them in writing. Ask for the deliverable defined the same way across any suppliers you compare, then compare like for like.

Question 17

Should we buy coastal radar or satellite sensing first when we can only afford one this cycle?

Accepted Answer

Coastal radar reaches only so far, so a state whose threat runs out past patrol range often gets more coverage per pound from wide-area orbital sensing that cues the hulls it already has. The honest answer depends on where your threat actually sits, which is why the comparison page lays the trade out neutrally rather than pushing one. We scope the waters first, then recommend the layer that closes the biggest gap.

Question 18

How do we keep the ports and ships that hold our maritime picture from being the weak link?

Accepted Answer

By hardening them as part of the same architecture rather than as a separate IT job. Maritime operational technology is often decades old and never built for a hostile network, and a port can be closed by code as effectively as by blockade. Maritime cyber protection covers vessels, terminals and the supply chain together, so the infrastructure receiving the picture stays trustworthy, with findings accountable to you alone.

Coastal radar stops at the horizon. Your economic zone does not.

Capabilities that solve this