Field-upgradable UAS
The system they never see coming
Overview
This field-upgradable unmanned aircraft system is built to change where it operates rather than where it was made. A conventional airframe goes back to a depot, often a foreign one, for every new sensor, radio or software load, and each round-trip costs weeks and leaves a gap in coverage. This platform is opened, reconfigured and returned to the mission by the crews who fly it, so a capability the enemy has not seen before can appear between one sortie and the next. Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance and adaptive mission planning keeps it flying the task when conditions shift, and secure communications with military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and resilient mesh networking hold the link in contested spectrum. Swarming lets several aircraft coordinate one plan. Because the manufacturer sustains the platform in-region and runs its own operator-certification pipeline, the customer builds the skills to keep upgrading the aircraft rather than renting them from the maker every time the threat moves.
An unmanned aircraft that evolves where it operates, field-upgradable by the crews who fly it, so a new sensor, radio or software load can appear between one sortie and the next instead of waiting weeks for a depot round-trip.
Capabilities
- Field-upgradable platform reconfigured where it operates, so capability tracks the mission rather than the depot calendar
- Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance and adaptive mission planning to hold the task as conditions shift
- Secure communications with military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and resilient mesh networking for contested spectrum
- Swarming for coordinated multi-agent execution of a single mission plan
- Operator training through the manufacturer's certification pipeline, building the crews who own the upgrade cycle
- Sustained in-region by one accountable team, keeping spares and support close to where the aircraft flies
Specifications
| Type | Field-upgradable UAS |
| Upgrades | In the field |
| Origin | Independent / non-aligned |
| Support | In-region sustainment |
Why Unstrat: the difference
Unstrat is the authorised global representative and distributor for this capability. It is already in service with a track record behind it, so you are buying something that has done the job elsewhere, not funding a first attempt. You are not the test bed.
Independent, non-aligned origin, with no political exposure to any major-power ecosystem.
One accountable team from first briefing through delivery and in-region sustainment.
Upgraded in the field as the mission changes, not resealed at a foreign factory that controls when and whether the change is allowed.
Because the customer's own crews reconfigure the aircraft, the skill to keep pace with the threat stays in the unit rather than being rented back from the maker.
How it reaches you
Related capability
View all →
Procurement & sustainment
Classification and the end-user-certificate chain are confirmed before this capability is represented to your market.
Sourced from an independent manufacturer: no major-power disclosure rules or political conditions.
A single team responsible from first briefing through delivery: not a chain of foreign primes to integrate yourself.
Lifecycle support and operator training delivered in-region, building capability that outlasts the initial deployment.
Questions buyers ask
What is a field-upgradable UAS?
An unmanned aircraft that is changed where it operates rather than returned to a depot for every new capability. The Unmanned Systems Developer's platform is in service and upgraded in the hands of the crews who fly it, carrying autonomous navigation with adaptive mission planning, encrypted anti-jam mesh communications and coordinated multi-agent execution. The design intent is capability that moves with the threat instead of waiting for a depot slot.
See: Upgrade paths and onboard stackAgainst PD-2 and KARGU on field upgrade
How long does it take to reconfigure a UAS in the field?
Ukrspecsystems publishes the benchmark: 15 minutes, no tools, for a full airframe configuration change on the PD-2, with the performance consequences stated for each state. We do not publish a reconfiguration time, and that is a gap a tender should close. Ask every bidder to perform the change in front of you and hold a stopwatch.
Field upgrade or depot upgrade: which costs more?
Depot upgrade costs airframe availability, shipping, insurance and export paperwork on every cycle. Field upgrade converts that into crew time and spares. None of the three suppliers in our comparison publishes a cost per upgrade cycle, so make each bidder state the round-trip time and cost for one capability change and the number of aircraft grounded while it happens.
Can we add our own payloads to the aircraft?
Payload interface documentation is the question that decides this, and it belongs in the contract. STM's payload range for KARGU is impressive and it is entirely STM's: anti-personnel and armour-piercing warheads, an RF seeker and a jamming payload. Neither published competitor states a third-party integration path. If integrating a national sensor matters, require the interface documents from every bidder and hold us to the same requirement.
UAS that can change role between missions without a depot visit
PD-2 is the clearest published example, switching between three factory-defined airframe configurations in 15 minutes with no tools and publishing the endurance and payload for each state. Our claim is broader in scope, covering upgrade of the platform in the field as the mission changes rather than switching between preset states, but PD-2's version is the one with numbers attached today. Ask for both to be demonstrated rather than described.
Field-upgradable drone with anti-jam communications
Our platform runs military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and resilient mesh networking, which also carries the swarming coordination. Ukrspecsystems publishes a dual-datalink system stated as jam-resistant at 180+ km; STM publishes GNSS-denied operational capability and a ground control unit qualified to MIL-STD-810G. Those are three different answers to the same problem, and only a live jamming trial separates them.
See: Communications row in the comparisonElectronic warfare and link resilience
Who trains the crews who perform the field upgrades?
We do, through the same certification pipeline that trains the operators, because an upgrade capability nobody is trained to use is a specification rather than a capability. Neither Ukrspecsystems nor Baykar publishes operator training for upgrades on the relevant product pages. Make crew upgrade training an explicit deliverable rather than an assumed one.
See: Operator certification pipelineTraining on upgrades, by supplier
Does a field-upgradable UAS support swarming?
Ours does: coordinated multi-agent mission execution is part of the same stack as the navigation and communications. STM publishes a decentralised swarm with real-time addition and removal of platforms, which is the most detailed published architecture in this comparison. Ukrspecsystems publishes signal relay between aircraft to extend range but not swarming. Check which of the three definitions a vendor means before you accept the word.
See: Swarming row in the comparisonSwarming as a capability layer
What endurance and payload does the platform have after an upgrade?
We do not publish MTOW, endurance or payload for the field-upgradable platform, and both competitors publish theirs before and after reconfiguration. STM is admirably specific: adding an RF seeker takes KARGU from 7 kg to 8.4 kg and cuts endurance from 30 minutes to 25. That is honest engineering, because an upgrade that costs five minutes is still worth it against the right target, and it is the standard to hold us to.
Our aircraft spend months out of service waiting on depot upgrades. What would change with a field-upgradable platform?
The waiting moves from a shipping schedule to a stores request. Upgrades are applied where the aircraft operates, by crews trained through the same pipeline, so the fleet evolves at the pace of your threat rather than the pace of a depot queue. The honest caveat is that field upgrade is a permission question too: if the airframe is sealed and the software signed, physical accessibility changes nothing.
See: Upgraded where it operatesPermission, not just engineering
How do we specify field upgradability so a bidder cannot satisfy it with a firmware update?
Name the changes you expect to make and the level at which they must be performed. List payload swap, datalink change, autonomy update and airframe reconfiguration separately, state who performs each one, and require a timed demonstration by your own crews rather than the vendor's engineers. PD-2's 15-minute tool-free change is a fair benchmark to write into the requirement.
What does GNSS jamming do to a field-upgradable UAS, and how would we test it?
Test it rather than read about it. STM publishes GNSS-denied operational capability for KARGU and a dive-attack pod for exactly that condition; Ukrspecsystems publishes a jam-resistant dual datalink. Our platform carries military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and mesh networking. Run the trial with your own electronic warfare unit, degrade the link and the satellite signal at the same moment, and record what the aircraft does next.
See: Communications and jamming resistanceSensing and jamming in contested spectrum
If we buy a field-upgradable UAS, are we still dependent on the manufacturer for new capability?
Partly, always, and the size of that dependency is what you are really negotiating. If the payload catalogue is closed and the software signed by the vendor, the aircraft evolves at the manufacturer's pace and under its government's export decisions. Our position is that the crew performs the upgrade, sustainment is in-region and the supplier is non-aligned, so the pace of change follows your threat rather than someone else's release schedule.
Which field-upgradable UAS carries the least export risk for a non-aligned state?
Ukrspecsystems states plainly that PD-2 is ITAR free with no export restrictions, which is real and verifiable. The residual question for any Ukrainian supplier is production priority while their own forces are fighting. The Unmanned Systems Developer's origin is non-aligned with in-region sustainment, so neither a foreign licence nor a domestic wartime queue sits between you and a spare part.
We are standing up a small unmanned force. Does field upgradability matter more than peak performance?
For most small forces, yes, because availability decides whether a capability exists on a given morning and peak specification decides only what it can do on its best day. A platform crews can change and repair keeps flying through the wear and attrition that ground a sealed aircraft. Pair it with modular airframe kits and the same training pipeline, and the force keeps its own capability rather than renting it.
See: Kits the unit assembles and repairsUnmanned platforms, crews and swarming in one envelope
Field-upgradable UAS: questions
What are Field-upgradable UAS?
Field-upgradable UAS are Unstrat's Sky (Air Domain) capability: This field-upgradable unmanned aircraft system is built to change where it operates rather than where it was made. A conventional airframe goes back to a depot, often a foreign one, for every new sensor, radio or software load, and each round-trip costs weeks and leaves a gap in coverage. This platform is opened, reconfigured and returned to the mission by the crews who fly it, so a capability the enemy has not seen before can appear between one sortie and the next. Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance and adaptive mission planning keeps it flying the task when conditions shift, and secure communications with military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and resilient mesh networking hold the link in contested spectrum. Swarming lets several aircraft coordinate one plan. Because the manufacturer sustains the platform in-region and runs its own operator-certification pipeline, the customer builds the skills to keep upgrading the aircraft rather than renting them from the maker every time the threat moves.
How do Field-upgradable UAS work?
Field-upgradable UAS deliver their effect through Field-upgradable platform reconfigured where it operates, so capability tracks the mission rather than the depot calendar, Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance and adaptive mission planning to hold the task as conditions shift and Secure communications with military-grade encryption, anti-jamming and resilient mesh networking for contested spectrum, capabilities matched to the requirement and confirmed under briefing rather than published.
Who makes Field-upgradable UAS?
Field-upgradable UAS are built by The Unmanned Systems Developer, whose focus is counter-uas, loitering munitions & unmanned aircraft. Unstrat represents The Unmanned Systems Developer to government and enterprise buyers worldwide as an independent, non-aligned prime vendor.
Why choose Field-upgradable UAS over a major-power alternative?
Field-upgradable UAS are sourced from an independent, non-aligned manufacturer, so they carry no major-power disclosure rules, upgrade-locks or political ramifications. Concretely: upgraded in the field as the mission changes, not resealed at a foreign factory that controls when and whether the change is allowed and Because the customer's own crews reconfigure the aircraft, the skill to keep pace with the threat stays in the unit rather than being rented back from the maker. The capability is accountable to you, not to a foreign vendor's government and its release schedule.
How are Field-upgradable UAS procured, and where can it be exported?
An unmanned aircraft that evolves where it operates, field-upgradable by the crews who fly it, so a new sensor, radio or software load can appear between one sortie and the next instead of waiting weeks for a depot round-trip. Every engagement begins with a briefing, and export eligibility is confirmed per market under briefing rather than published. Where controlled capabilities are involved, the classification and end-user-certificate chain is confirmed first. Field-upgradable UAS are then sustained in-region by one accountable team from briefing through long-term operation.