Your attackers are funded like companies. Defend like a state.
Bank-grade defence for the systems that move billions: sector-specific security, financial-crime intelligence, live incident response and adversarial testing, all through one accountable channel.
The economics have turned against you
A bank no longer faces a lone intruder. It faces organisations, resourced, patient and structured like the enterprise they are attacking. They run reconnaissance, buy access, rehearse their moves and pick the settlement window that hurts most. Against that, a compliance posture built for audits rather than adversaries is not a defence. It is a paper trail waiting to be written up after the fact.
The target set is unforgiving. Payment networks, mobile-money platforms and anti-money-laundering engines carry a nation's economic activity, and downtime is not measured in outages but in settlement failures. The defence has to hold across all of it, continuously, at a scale most in-house teams were never staffed to match.
This is why financial institutions increasingly want a single accountable partner rather than a patchwork of tools and consultancies. Cyber defence purpose-built for financial firms is engineered for exactly this environment: regulated finance where the clock never stops and the cost of being wrong compounds by the second.
Protection tuned to the institution, not a generic template
Security for a bank is not security for a hospital or a factory with the logo swapped. The systems that move money have their own rhythms, their own regulators and their own failure modes, and the defence has to understand all three. Financial-sector cyber defence is built around payment networks, mobile-money platforms and the anti-money-laundering engines that sit behind them, with 7.5 billion accounts secured across cross-border payment and financial platforms.
Underneath the platform sits a round-the-clock security operation. Continuous defensive operations provide detection and response that keep critical systems defended at all hours, blocking 100,000-plus threats daily across fleets, grids and financial platforms. The point is not the raw number but what it represents: a defensive layer that is already fighting at the scale a national financial system generates, rather than one being sized up for the first time on your estate.
That layer is continuously hardened by what the same team finds when it plays the attacker. Defence and offence are run as one loop, so every weakness surfaced in testing feeds straight back into the systems that protect the institution.
Follow the money, not just the malware
Not every attack on a bank is a breach. A great deal of it is money moving where it should not, through accounts that look ordinary until you trace the flow. Defending the institution therefore means seeing the transactions as clearly as the intrusions.
Financial-crime and anti-money-laundering intelligence traces illicit flows across payment networks and jurisdictions, turning raw transaction data into an evidence chain that regulators and courts can act on. Because it is built by practitioners who already defend live payment networks, it reads like something an investigator can use rather than a black-box score handed down by a foreign vendor.
Inside the financial-defence suite, AI-native anti-money-laundering, built on graph analytics, transformers and LLM agents, cuts case triage from weeks to minutes. For an enterprise buyer that means analysts spend their time on the cases that matter instead of drowning in false positives, and the institution keeps the ability to see and act on illicit flows through its own systems, on its own terms.
Rehearse the breach before it arrives
The worst time to discover how your defences behave under attack is during the attack. The institutions that recover fastest are the ones that have already been broken into, safely, on their own terms, by people they hired.
Authorised offensive testing runs red-team engagements against live production environments, from payment networks to systems far beyond finance, exposing real weaknesses before an adversary finds them. It is conducted under strict legal and governance controls, and every finding feeds the defensive platforms. This is adversary simulation as a discipline, not a stunt.
When something does get through, live incident response contains, eradicates and recovers, shortening the dwell time in which an intruder can pivot deeper. The responders who arrive are the same practitioners who have broken into production systems legally, so they know how the adversary thinks. Every engagement leaves the estate more defensible than it was, because the findings feed straight back into hardening.
One channel, accountable to you
The value of assembling these capabilities under one roof is not just convenience. It is accountability. Unstrat is an independent, non-aligned vendor, which means the team defending the institution answers to the institution, not to a foreign government's disclosure obligations or a coalition's priorities.
For a bank, that independence matters as much as the technology. The systems being defended are the ones the wider economy rides on, and the people watching them should have no competing loyalty. Sector-specific protection, financial-crime intelligence, adversarial testing and rapid response arrive as one coordinated capability, from a single accountable channel, with no obligation to report what they find to anyone but you.
Attackers organised like companies deserve a defence organised like a state. That is the posture on offer: protection tuned to the institution, visibility into the movement of money, testing that finds the weakness first, and a response team already on call, held together and answerable to you alone. Nothing in it depends on a foreign government's goodwill, and nothing in it obliges you to hand over your findings to a party with priorities of its own.
